Meta:Community portal: Difference between revisions

Line 22:

=== Discussion ===

There are several deep problems here and I am disappointed with all involved.

# Bans should not be issued without explanation. Seriously. Nor should they take place without team awareness. Globe for example should have been involved and on board with the decision. If it was a random vandal, okay, slap and move on. TAP is a little more around than that. It's high profile by the low standard of this new farm.

# Why is a discord ban a vote on the meta community portal. Whyyyy...

# Why is Trust and Safety's instinct to respond with AGF. This should be examined internally by relevant staffers with the full evidence and responded to accordingly. It is not a matter that should be voted on.

# Why are there three support votes for an unban when nobody has seen the evidence. You trust Zippy to run this place, surely his decisions have weight, and it should be assumed that the decision was made responsibly. Such decisions should be overturned if there is a clear, complete case to say so. There is no such case presented here.

# Zippy made the choice as banning moderator, why doesn't he share the evidence himself? Present the counter case?

# Hang on, why was the ban issued anyway? What is the discussion even about?

When I was rambling off on discord about how a farm is measured by its response to crisis blah blah, this is precisely the sort of thing I meant, and it is not reassuring so far. Let the discussion be refactored accordingly. Or not.

[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 20:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 === Discussion ===
+There are several deep problems here and I am disappointed with all involved.
+# Bans should not be issued without explanation. Seriously. Nor should they take place without team awareness. Globe for example should have been involved and on board with the decision. If it was a random vandal, okay, slap and move on. TAP is a little more around than that. It's high profile by the low standard of this new farm.
+# Why is a discord ban a vote on the meta community portal. Whyyyy...
+# Why is Trust and Safety's instinct to respond with AGF. This should be examined internally by relevant staffers with the full evidence and responded to accordingly. It is not a matter that should be voted on.
+# Why are there three support votes for an unban when nobody has seen the evidence. You trust Zippy to run this place, surely his decisions have weight, and it should be assumed that the decision was made responsibly. Such decisions should be overturned if there is a clear, complete case to say so. There is no such case presented here.
+# Zippy made the choice as banning moderator, why doesn't he share the evidence himself? Present the counter case?
+# Hang on, why was the ban issued anyway? What is the discussion even about?
+When I was rambling off on discord about how a farm is measured by its response to crisis blah blah, this is precisely the sort of thing I meant, and it is not reassuring so far. Let the discussion be refactored accordingly. Or not.
+[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 20:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)