Requests for Comment/Direct Appointment by Stewards: Difference between revisions
From WikiOasis Meta
More actions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# {{Oppose}} as written. Permanent appointment without community approval is exactly the problem community governance is trying to solve. [[User:Tali64³|Tali64³]] ([[User talk:Tali64³|talk]]) 22:19, 1 May 2026 (UTC) | # {{Oppose}} as written. Permanent appointment without community approval is exactly the problem community governance is trying to solve. [[User:Tali64³|Tali64³]] ([[User talk:Tali64³|talk]]) 22:19, 1 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
#: I don’t plan on commenting further as I don’t have a strong opinion on this, but the community would still be able to initiate a revocation request. [[User:Globe|Globe]] ([[User talk:Globe|talk]]) 22:21, 1 May 2026 (UTC) | #: I don’t plan on commenting further as I don’t have a strong opinion on this, but the community would still be able to initiate a revocation request. [[User:Globe|Globe]] ([[User talk:Globe|talk]]) 22:21, 1 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
#: That's not the point of community governance, stewards themselves are accountable to the community, and their powers can be taken away for appointing people willy nilly, and GSes, GPs, and WCs, along with similar roles, can also be elected. This simply creates another pathway to solve an inevitable lack of volunteers. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 22:22, 1 May 2026 (UTC) | |||